Intruder is a solid vulnerability scanner, and if all you want is continuous monitoring of your attack surface, it does that job well. But a lot of founders arrive at Intruder for a different reason: a big prospect's security team asked for proof, and the deal is stuck in review. If that is why you are here, it is worth knowing exactly where a continuous scanner helps and where you will still have a gap to fill.
What Intruder does well
Intruder is a cloud-based vulnerability scanner aimed at teams that want ongoing coverage without running their own scanning stack. Based on its public pricing, plans run from an Essential tier at around $99 per month, a Cloud tier near $180, and a Pro tier near $240, with an Enterprise tier priced on request. What you pay scales with the number of targets you license, where a target is a single IP, hostname, or URL. There is also a free trial with a handful of licenses so you can see it against your own systems.
For its core job, it is genuinely useful:
- Continuous coverage. It keeps scanning as your surface changes, so a newly exposed service gets picked up instead of sitting unnoticed until the next annual test.
- Emerging threat checks. When a notable new vulnerability lands, it can proactively look for it across your targets.
- Clean workflow. The dashboard, integrations, and noise reduction are well built, and it is easy to live with day to day.
If your goal is to watch your own infrastructure over time, that is a reasonable pick. The question is whether it matches the job most seed and Series A founders are actually trying to finish.
The job most founders are really hiring for
Here is the pattern we see constantly. A five-person SaaS company gets a security questionnaire, or a direct request for a security report, from the enterprise buyer that would double their revenue. There is no CISO, no SOC 2 yet, and the champion inside the buyer needs something to hand their security team so the deal can move.
A continuous scanner is built to surface issues to you, the operator. It is not built to produce a document that convinces someone else's security reviewer that your app is safe to buy. Those are two different jobs, and the gap between them is where deals stall. So if you are evaluating an alternative, judge it against the outcome you actually need: getting past the review.
A scan report lists what a tool thinks might be wrong. A security reviewer on the buyer's side has to figure out which of those items are real, which are false positives, and what the actual risk is. That triage work is exactly what slows a review down. The more of it you can answer up front, with proof, the faster you clear it.
What to look for in an alternative
If your reason for shopping is to close a deal, not just to monitor your own infrastructure, weigh any option against these five things.
1. Verified findings, not a list of maybes
Automated scanners are prone to false positives. Every unverified finding is homework you or the buyer's team has to do before anyone trusts the result. Look for findings that are exploit-verified, where the tool actually confirmed the issue is real and shows how, so a reviewer does not have to take it on faith.
2. A report you can actually hand over
Ask whether the output is meant for the buyer or only for you. You want a shareable, branded, audit-ready document written for an external security reviewer, with clear evidence on each finding, not a raw dashboard export you have to interpret and re-explain.
3. An attestation of what was tested and fixed
Reviewers want a plain statement of scope and outcome: what was tested, what was found, and what was verified fixed. A signed attestation letter does more to unblock a review than a wall of scanner output, because it answers the reviewer's actual question directly.
4. A retest that proves you closed the gaps
Finding issues is half the job. The version you hand a buyer should show those issues closed. Look for an included retest after you ship fixes, so the proof you deliver reflects the fixed state, not the state at first scan.
5. Pricing that fits a pre-revenue budget
Per-target subscription pricing is fine for ongoing monitoring, but it can be an awkward fit when your immediate need is a single deal-enabling deliverable. Be clear about whether you are buying a monitoring subscription or a one-time proof you can put in a buyer's hands, and price the option against the outcome.
Where Vulnytics fits
Vulnytics is built for exactly the job above: passing an enterprise security review and closing the deal, without a security team of your own. It runs an exploit-verified test of your web app and external attack surface, then packages the result the way a buyer's reviewer wants to receive it.
- Findings are exploit-verified, with a working proof of concept on each one and near-zero false positives, so a reviewer is not left triaging maybes.
- You get a shareable, branded, audit-ready dossier plus a signed attestation letter stating what was tested, found, and verified fixed.
- A free retest after you ship fixes means the version you hand over shows issues closed.
- Turnaround is in days, for a flat $1,500 to $2,500, so you are buying an outcome rather than an open-ended subscription.
- If you also want ongoing coverage, there is a continuous option, so you are not forced to choose between deal proof today and monitoring later.
| Vulnytics | Continuous scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Pass the security review | Monitor your own surface |
| Findings | Exploit-verified, PoC on each | Scanner output, may include false positives |
| Buyer-ready report | Shareable dossier | Dashboard / export for you |
| Attestation letter | Signed, included | Not the format |
| Retest after fixes | Included | Rescan on your plan |
| Hands-on human testing | Included, expert reviews on every plan | No, automated only |
| Pricing shape | Flat $1.5k–$2.5k outcome | Per-target subscription |
If what you want is steady, low-effort monitoring of your infrastructure over time, a continuous scanner like Intruder is a sensible choice, and the two approaches work well together. Use Vulnytics to produce the proof that clears a review now, and keep a scanner running for ongoing coverage after. The point is to match the tool to the job in front of you.
Need proof for a stuck deal, not just a dashboard?
Get an exploit-verified, audit-ready report and a signed attestation letter you can hand to your buyer's security team in days, for a flat price. No security team required.
Vulnytics helps B2B SaaS founders pass enterprise security reviews and close the deal. Proof, not noise.
Intruder pricing and plan details are drawn from Intruder's publicly published pricing at the time of writing and may change; check their site for current figures. Comparisons describe general differences between continuous vulnerability scanning and exploit-verified, deal-enablement testing, and are not a claim about any specific engagement. Vulnytics combines exploit-verified automated assessment with hands-on expert review by a person. We are not an accredited penetration-testing firm, so this complements, and does not universally replace, a certified manual pentest where one is formally mandated.